Post by cabintom on Feb 15, 2015 14:03:11 GMT
I'm trying to figure out whether the following species is properly:
Sevenia occidentalium (Mabille, 1876)
OR
Sallya occidentalium (Mabille, 1876)
Mark Williams, in his Afrotropical Butterflies online encyclopedia, records the following:
"Genus Sevenia Koçak, 1996
Centre for Entomological Studies Miscellaneous Papers 27-28: 13 (10-16).
Replacement name for Crenis Boisduval, 1833 nec Hübner, 1821, and Sallya Hemming, 1964 nec Yochelson, 1956 (Mollusca).
= Asterope auctt., nec Hübner, [1819]. Verzeichniss bekannter Schmettlinge 432 + 72.
= Crenis Boisduval, 1833. Nouvelles Annales du Muséum d’Histoire Naturelle, Paris 2: 196 (149-270). Type-species: Crenis madagascariensis Boisduval, by monotypy. Invalid; junior homonym of Crenis Hübner, 1821.
= Sallya Hemming, 1964. Annotationes lepidopterologicae (Part 4): 139 (139-140). Replacement name for Crenis Boisduval.
Ackery et al. (1995: 359) follow Jenkins 1990 (Bulletin of the Allyn Museum No. 131: 177 pp.) in treating Sallya [= Sevenia] as generically distinct; the more usual convention has been to regard Sallya as a subgenus of the otherwise New World genus Eunica Hübner. Lees et al. (2003) treat Sevenia as a subgenus of Eunica but Larsen (2005a) treats it as a genus distinct from Eunica.
An Afrotropical genus containing 18 species."
While sites like funet (and other places) still consider Sallya to be the valid genus, and Sevenia as a synonym.
I guess, what it comes down to is that I don't understand the reasoning (recorded by M. Williams) for why Sevenia may have replaced Sallya... maybe you can help decipher this for me?
Thanks!
Tom
Sevenia occidentalium (Mabille, 1876)
OR
Sallya occidentalium (Mabille, 1876)
Mark Williams, in his Afrotropical Butterflies online encyclopedia, records the following:
"Genus Sevenia Koçak, 1996
Centre for Entomological Studies Miscellaneous Papers 27-28: 13 (10-16).
Replacement name for Crenis Boisduval, 1833 nec Hübner, 1821, and Sallya Hemming, 1964 nec Yochelson, 1956 (Mollusca).
= Asterope auctt., nec Hübner, [1819]. Verzeichniss bekannter Schmettlinge 432 + 72.
= Crenis Boisduval, 1833. Nouvelles Annales du Muséum d’Histoire Naturelle, Paris 2: 196 (149-270). Type-species: Crenis madagascariensis Boisduval, by monotypy. Invalid; junior homonym of Crenis Hübner, 1821.
= Sallya Hemming, 1964. Annotationes lepidopterologicae (Part 4): 139 (139-140). Replacement name for Crenis Boisduval.
Ackery et al. (1995: 359) follow Jenkins 1990 (Bulletin of the Allyn Museum No. 131: 177 pp.) in treating Sallya [= Sevenia] as generically distinct; the more usual convention has been to regard Sallya as a subgenus of the otherwise New World genus Eunica Hübner. Lees et al. (2003) treat Sevenia as a subgenus of Eunica but Larsen (2005a) treats it as a genus distinct from Eunica.
An Afrotropical genus containing 18 species."
While sites like funet (and other places) still consider Sallya to be the valid genus, and Sevenia as a synonym.
I guess, what it comes down to is that I don't understand the reasoning (recorded by M. Williams) for why Sevenia may have replaced Sallya... maybe you can help decipher this for me?
Thanks!
Tom