|
Post by wollastoni on Feb 18, 2016 9:27:45 GMT
Could anyone share some pictures of the 4 known forms of Delias mira cieko ? Along with descriptions if possible. Did Henk van Mastrigt explain the % of each form in the Pass Valley population ?
I have a strange specimen and I would like to know which form it is. I will post a picture of it later.
On the Delias website, I see only 2 forms B and D.
|
|
indra
New Aurelian
Posts: 21
Country: U.S.A.
|
Post by indra on Feb 18, 2016 18:46:27 GMT
|
|
|
Post by wollastoni on Feb 18, 2016 19:41:45 GMT
Thank you so much John !
I have worked on this simplified identification tool from this paper
I now have to check my specimens !
|
|
|
Post by wollastoni on Feb 18, 2016 20:38:13 GMT
After verification, I have only form C (from Baliem Valley) and form D (from Korupun) in collection.
|
|
|
Post by Adam Cotton on Feb 18, 2016 21:23:07 GMT
Can you explain to someone who knows little about NG Delias why the website uses the species name roepkei but you call it Delias mira?
Adam.
|
|
|
Post by wollastoni on Feb 18, 2016 22:28:20 GMT
Sure.
Delias mira is a Delias species distributed both in Western and Eastern New Guinea In Kerowagi area, 2 different stable taxa were identified : mira excelsa and roepkei. Thus roepkei was described as a separated species (2 ssp cannot fly in the same locality... at least for a long period, but that's another topic) Then a new taxon was discovered in the Pass Valley (W Papua) and was described as Delias roepkei cieko
But it appears with time that "excelsa" and "roepkei roepkei" never shared the same locality ! roepkei is from Kerowagi and extensa from Wau area.
Thus the status of separate species for roepkei ssp has no sense and we have now Delias mira roepkei in Kerowagi, Delias mira excelsa in Wau and Delias mira cieko in the Pass Valley.
The Delias website has to be updated.
BTW 99% of offered Delias mira excelsa on the market are in fact Delias mira roepkei. Real "excelsa" are rare in collection, mine were collected many years ago
|
|
|
Post by africaone on Feb 19, 2016 12:13:17 GMT
I have a strange specimen and I would like to know which form it is. I will post a picture of it later.
and ? ....
|
|
|
Post by wollastoni on Feb 19, 2016 12:24:34 GMT
And finally it appears to be the rare form C. I will post a picture of it on Sunday (I am in France right now) From discussions with other collectors, it seems that most specimens in collection are form D. Danny, Peter, John, do you have forms A, B or C ?
|
|
|
Post by deliasfanatic on Feb 19, 2016 14:36:46 GMT
My cieko are all "D" with little variation. However, the various forms seem to be present in at least some of the other subspecies. Here are a few of my roepkei series; the upper 3 are males, with a "normal" form at top and two with more extensive white. At bottom are two females, quite different from one another. My excelsa males show some variation too.
|
|
|
Post by wollastoni on Feb 19, 2016 15:07:10 GMT
Interesting, I need to check my ssp. roepkei too
|
|
|
Post by nomad on Feb 19, 2016 18:52:05 GMT
I have only one male specimen of cieko and it is a typical form D.
|
|
|
Post by Adam Cotton on Feb 19, 2016 22:14:35 GMT
Olivier,
Thanks for the explanation, which makes sense assuming mira has priority.
Adam.
|
|
|
Post by timmsyrj on Feb 20, 2016 6:08:04 GMT
Olivier is it "extensa" or excelsa, I have 9 specimens I got from I.F.T.A before they closed but then again as they are from Kerowagi they would be neither, they came labelled as mira excelsa but would be roepkei.
Rich
|
|
|
Post by deliasfanatic on Feb 20, 2016 6:25:25 GMT
Rich - excelsa is the proper name, but that ssp is from the Wau area. The names were confused for years, but those from Kerowagi are all roepkei. Edit - I see that I made a typo above, sorry - correcting it now. Another edit - aha! Typo was caused by copying Olivier's text and not making a mental correction!
|
|
|
Post by timmsyrj on Feb 20, 2016 6:28:37 GMT
Thanks, I've checked and my roepkei are all like the top male specimen above.
Rich
|
|