|
Post by nomad on Sept 14, 2015 9:17:41 GMT
The Large Tortoiseshell Nymphalis polychloros became extinct in the U.K in the latter part of the 1950s, although there have been a few recent sightings, notably in the Isle of Wight on the southern coast of England. These are probably a few immigrants or perhaps released continental butterflies. When N.polychloros was a resident species, its numbers always used to fluctuate, in some localities it was common, only to decline then reappear again. In Britain, it was mainly a butterfly of well wooded districts. The reasons for it disappearance are unknown. It just slipped away without anybody really taking much notice, they were no ecological studies in those days. Various reasons for its dramatic disappearance have been put forward such as habitat change, climatic conditions and larvae parasites or perhaps a combination of these. It was gone before Dutch Elm disease saw the destruction of its foodplant, the elm in the U.K during 1970s. There seems to be little difference between the old British race and those found in the rest of Europe. Here is a nice drawer of historical British specimens from various English localities. The specimen data here is a valuable study resource. We can see in which years it was found and where it occurred. Also museum specimens are becoming a super study resource to track climate change.
|
|
|
Post by nomad on Sept 14, 2015 9:19:56 GMT
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 14, 2015 14:35:03 GMT
ere are a couple of mine, New Forest 1890's
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 14, 2015 14:36:05 GMT
|
|
|
Post by trehopr1 on Sept 15, 2015 2:29:29 GMT
Gentlemen, I find this style of spreading curious. Does the style have a name of some sort applied to it? I find it rather attractive in a way (and in its own right). The forewings are not quite perpendicular and yet they are nearly always nicely symmetrical and the specimens often ex-pupa appearing. Great stuff really. If I could go to British fairs I'd be all over that kind of material.
|
|
|
Post by nomad on Sept 15, 2015 5:07:14 GMT
The setting style you see here, was the standard for the old British entomologists, today all set on a level plain and with straight forewing margins. In what I call the Japenese style , the forewings are raised up with a good gap between the hindwings.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 15, 2015 9:58:28 GMT
A practice that also seems to have been abandoned long ago in butterflies is the teasing out of the forelegs, many of my older specimens are mounted in this way, a lot of moths are still set like this although I only so it for sphingidae.
|
|
|
Post by frohawksghost on Sept 22, 2015 15:11:13 GMT
A practice that also seems to have been abandoned long ago in butterflies is the teasing out of the forelegs, many of my older specimens are mounted in this way, a lot of moths are still set like this although I only so it for sphingidae. I was taught to set (by one of the greats of 20th century entomology) in such a way that the legs were, when it was practical, arranged attractively. My mentor was a fastidious man, and it mattered that the antennae were exactly parallel to the leading edge of the forewings also - looking at many modern specimens you'll see that this attention to detail isn't there - but a specimen set thusly always looks 'right'.
|
|
|
Post by nomad on Sept 22, 2015 18:25:10 GMT
May one ask who your mentor was.
|
|