|
Post by nomad on Apr 11, 2015 20:43:29 GMT
|
|
weymouthent
New Aurelian
Posts: 20
Country: United Kingdom
|
Post by weymouthent on Apr 11, 2015 21:23:30 GMT
Hi Peter, The hoverfly looks very much like a male Platycheirus albimanus, the inflated front tarsus being a characteristic of most of the male Platycheirus species, with this species in particular being fairly common.
|
|
|
Post by nomad on Apr 12, 2015 5:33:57 GMT
Many thanks for the ID Mick.
|
|
|
Post by mygos on Apr 12, 2015 8:03:57 GMT
Amazing photographs Peter, Thank you A+, Michel
|
|
|
Post by timmsyrj on Apr 12, 2015 16:55:08 GMT
Excellent photo's Peter, that's either a very big lens and strong flash or the insects around your way are tame, I could never get that close to have time to focus and shoot before they flew off, I became an expert at taking shots of flower heads, insects having long gone.
|
|
|
Post by wollastoni on Apr 12, 2015 17:02:58 GMT
Good idea Peter !
Very few insects on my terrace in Milano for the moment. Only some beautiful Osmia bees who are looking for some little holes in my table and chairs to put their eggs.
Insects will arrive later when my plants will be blossoming.
About butterflies, last year there were many Cacyreus marshalli and Pieris rapae. Also some moths, mainly Noctuidae.
|
|
|
Post by nomad on Apr 12, 2015 17:39:41 GMT
Excellent photo's Peter, that's either a very big lens and strong flash or the insects around your way are tame, I could never get that close to have time to focus and shoot before they flew off, I became an expert at taking shots of flower heads, insects having long gone. Hi Rich. Thanks. No flash, just natural sunlight with a fast shutter speed. I never use a flash outdoors. I just lie in wait with a close up 105mm macro.
|
|
|
Post by timmsyrj on Apr 13, 2015 6:22:24 GMT
Lying around watching insects, sounds like work. What camera do you use.
Rich
|
|
|
Post by mygos on Apr 13, 2015 9:53:58 GMT
Lying around watching insects, sounds like work. What camera do you use. Rich I think the camera is not all the explanation, and the observation's talent and patience of Peter are the main reasons for such good shots A+, Michel
|
|
|
Post by timmsyrj on Apr 13, 2015 16:59:25 GMT
Totally agree it's not all the camera but to get good clear focused shots of moving objects like insects without a flash to "freeze" the image needs more than your average camera, mine is a Fuji finepix S8400W, 16 megapixel Wi Fi bridge camera which set me back around £300, I'm guessing Peter uses something much better than that, the lens on mine is an f4.3 which I don't feel is adequate for live shots of insects, dead, set specimens it's good enough.
Rich
|
|
|
Post by nomad on Apr 13, 2015 17:06:54 GMT
Thank you for your kind comments Michel. Yes, just patience is often the answer, you never know what might come calling. Rich, I use a standard SLR Nikon D7000 but the attached lens is just as important as the camera that you choose to use. For insects in flight, you must have a high ISO number, but also have a good depth of field, which means for me, who does not use a flash outdoors, plenty of bright weather. Yes it is hard work lying around the garden. The real fun begins on photography field trips, of which I hope there will be plenty of this year. I like to keep my field equipment simple, sometimes I see people photographing insects with large tripods with cameras that have huge flashes on top. . Although they may produce fantastic shots, that kind of photography is not for me, especially as I always travel by train or bus and rarely by car. The lens size is a matter of preference, many that photograph insects, started with birds, and they have those long lens, but I prefer to get close in, so I like my 105mm macro.
|
|
|
Post by timmsyrj on Apr 14, 2015 18:43:02 GMT
Years ago I had a Minolta with a good macro lens, f1.9, 80mm that I used with a ring flash, brilliant for macro work on set specimens as you had no shadow, ok for field work but a bit front heavy, trouble was back then you'd take 24 or 36 photo's, send the film off to be developed and end up paying for 1 or 2 reasonable shots if you were lucky, nowadays with digital if you missed the subject you just delete it and carry on. Plus you can change ISO speeds to suit the lighting conditions on the day, back then if the weather went dark you had to use a flash or go home, unless you carried additional camera bodies with different ISO films loaded, very expensive. I think the lens is way more important than the camera, the camera only captures what the lens sees, the better the lens, the more light gets through to shoot greater depth of field which is essential with macro work or else half the subject is blurry, flash is good for freezing the subject so in that millisecond you can get the wings stationary if you're lucky. I look forward to seeing more of your photo's Peter from your field trips.
Rich
|
|