|
Post by wollastoni on Sept 9, 2019 8:41:55 GMT
We have always thought that Papilio hermeli was a subspecies of the protected CITES I Papilio chikae.Well the CITES organisation has proposed to adapt to scientific classifications and has now proposed to put protect hermeli as a subspecies of chikaeIt makes sense to have the same law for both subspecies, and it will easier for customs. Even if chikae and hermeli are a common lepidoptera and that a CITES I protection for a common bug is a nonsense... but that's another topic.
|
|
|
Post by wollastoni on Sept 9, 2019 8:42:57 GMT
Does anyone know if there were any other proposals concerning insects during that 18th meeting ?
|
|
|
Post by Adam Cotton on Sept 9, 2019 10:53:29 GMT
It's a pity they decided to use genus Achillides instead of treating it as a subgenus of Papilio. There is no real justification for separating them at generic level, except that Page is a splitter.
Adam.
|
|
|
Post by Adam Cotton on Sept 9, 2019 10:57:01 GMT
In my personal opinion CITES should have downgraded chikae to appendix II and included ssp. hermeli with it there. Perhaps the next step will be to downgrade the status, as chikae can be reared in habitat and is not actually that rare.
Of course "HABITAT" is the important word. They should spend all the money they waste on paperwork in protecting habitats, and the species would be safe.
Adam.
|
|
|
Post by exoticimports on Sept 9, 2019 19:08:40 GMT
. They should spend all the money they waste on paperwork in protecting habitats, and the species would be safe. Adam. CITES was a good idea that’s been hijacked to make men more rich. It’s not about ecology it’s about power and money. I’ve seen plenty of fish cops but I’ve never seen one bend down and pick up monofilament.
|
|